▲ 470 ▼ Jellyfin over the internet (startrek.website) submitted 1 year ago by TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world 265 comments fedilink hide all child comments What’s your go too (secure) method for casting over the internet with a Jellyfin server. I’m wondering what to use and I’m pretty beginner at this
[+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 year ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) a rule blocking connections from other countries, and also requiring the request for the login page come from one of the services on your domain, will block virtually all malicious attempts to access your services. Whoa whoa whoa. What malicious attempts? You just told me you were the statistical wonder that nobody is bothering attack? That’s 2k requests made. None of them were served. So those 2k requests were not you then? They were hostile actors attempting to gain unauthorized access to your services? Well there we have it folks lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) As OP should be. 2k attempts a day at unauthorized access to your services is a pretty clear indicator of that. Seems you’ve mitigated it well enough, why would you suggest that OP not bother doing the same? If you’re so convinced those 2k attempts are not malicious, then go ahead and remove those rules if they’re unnecessary. Perhaps as someone with only meager experience running a Jellyfin server who can’t even recognize malicious traffic to their server, and zero understanding of the modern internet threat landscape, you shouldn’t be spreading misinformation that’s potentially damaging to new selfhosters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) a rule blocking connections from other countries, and also requiring the request for the login page come from one of the services on your domain, will block virtually all malicious attempts to access your services. Whoa whoa whoa. What malicious attempts? You just told me you were the statistical wonder that nobody is bothering attack? That’s 2k requests made. None of them were served. So those 2k requests were not you then? They were hostile actors attempting to gain unauthorized access to your services? Well there we have it folks lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) As OP should be. 2k attempts a day at unauthorized access to your services is a pretty clear indicator of that. Seems you’ve mitigated it well enough, why would you suggest that OP not bother doing the same? If you’re so convinced those 2k attempts are not malicious, then go ahead and remove those rules if they’re unnecessary. Perhaps as someone with only meager experience running a Jellyfin server who can’t even recognize malicious traffic to their server, and zero understanding of the modern internet threat landscape, you shouldn’t be spreading misinformation that’s potentially damaging to new selfhosters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) As OP should be. 2k attempts a day at unauthorized access to your services is a pretty clear indicator of that. Seems you’ve mitigated it well enough, why would you suggest that OP not bother doing the same? If you’re so convinced those 2k attempts are not malicious, then go ahead and remove those rules if they’re unnecessary. Perhaps as someone with only meager experience running a Jellyfin server who can’t even recognize malicious traffic to their server, and zero understanding of the modern internet threat landscape, you shouldn’t be spreading misinformation that’s potentially damaging to new selfhosters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) As OP should be. 2k attempts a day at unauthorized access to your services is a pretty clear indicator of that. Seems you’ve mitigated it well enough, why would you suggest that OP not bother doing the same? If you’re so convinced those 2k attempts are not malicious, then go ahead and remove those rules if they’re unnecessary. Perhaps as someone with only meager experience running a Jellyfin server who can’t even recognize malicious traffic to their server, and zero understanding of the modern internet threat landscape, you shouldn’t be spreading misinformation that’s potentially damaging to new selfhosters? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case. Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) You’ve argued from a position of weakness against a well known and accepted truth, and have provided zero proof to back up your outlandish claim. On the contrary you’ve admitted to the existence of unwanted access attempts to your services, as well as your usage of mitigations to the same problem you insist doesn’t exist. It’s over man. You’re certified expert yapper but that’s not going to convince me or anyone else here that you know what you’re talking about. It’s a wrap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)