you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The only songs reencoded to that quality is a sample of the 0-streams songs, which do make up a lot of the total count.

    Everything that has been listened to at least once is in high quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    0-popularity, not 0-streams, which are two different metrics according to the archive blog post. But nevertheless, the re-encoded stuff is stuff pretty much no one will miss. Also Opus at 75kbps is much better than Vorbis or mp3 at that bitrate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    What I've read is it's about: Preservation.

    This aint just about piracy because free media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    And that's why I think it's an issue. The least popular tracks, which are the most likely ones to disappear from the internet, are the ones they store in the lowest quality. While I'm glad they made this huge effort for preservation, and understand the limitations of storage space, I also wish they would have at least preserved the original 160kbps streams.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I've literally never been unable to find ogg, flac or mp3s for any album on Soulseek. Why is scraping Spotify even necessary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    There is probably a lot of listening data that could be useful. Say you like a particular song, you could look at what other songs people who stream that do also streamed a lot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment