The Japanese region of Niigata is expected to endorse a decision to restart the world's largest nuclear power plant on Monday, a watershed moment in the country's pivot back to nuclear since the 2011 Fukushima disaster.

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, located about 220 km (136 miles) northwest of Tokyo, was among 54 reactors shut after a massive earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Daiichi plant in the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 50 points 10 months ago (14 children)

Easy for me to say because we don't have Nuclear here but... probably the right choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I live not far from Fukushima (though I moved here about a decade after the disaster) and I agree. We have a huge affordability crisis going on with inflation/stagflation. Taking the nuclear plants offline caused reliance on fossil fuels, a lot of which were imported (including from Russia) and all that new cost had to be borne by someone which of course ended up being the consumers.

    In an ideal world, we'd have more renewables and storage, but we're not there yet. Being mostly mountainous, at the boundary of 3 tectonic plates, and having plenty of natural disasters also doesn't help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The day earthquakes can get harnessed for energy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Where does the uranium get imported from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    tbf, a nuclear power plant in a tsunami prone region is a bad idea.

    I think nuclear energy is the way to go. at least use it to get rid of fossil fuel dependency, then we can continue to expand other renewables.

    doing this is just calling for another Godzilla attack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    a nuclear power plant in a tsunami prone region is a bad idea.

    Not if the facility is built to deal with those outcomes, like tsunami and earthquakes. Fukushima design was criticized when built for ignoring safety in designs to save money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments