you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

I mean, I'm certain that if you consider there to be many reputable scientific publications having studies to the contrary, you should at least be able to post a single one, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Sure. Here is a decent one:

    Environment and sustainability development: A ChatGPT perspective

    Priyanka Bhaskar, Neha Seth

    Applied Data Science and Smart Systems, 54-62, 2024

    Point is finding it or the dozens like it take like 2 seconds on Google scholar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Great!

    Now, where in the paper did you find the primary claims about water consumption?

    (There are none. You didn't read the paper)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Well, I suppose one of us didn't. XD

    Or at least couldn't make it to section V. They mentioned the common claim, for instance, that GPT 3 alone took three quarters of a million gallons of water to train (roughly the footprint of 3-400) cars.

    But, please, keep congratulating yourself. I was selection based on the criteria of (1) easy to read (2) multiple environmental issues listed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment