you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 11 months ago (20 children)

Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I'm gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it's something more simplistic.

Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    I didn't fail, I actually succeeded. Plus judging by how hard it was to do a simple algorithm an algorithm like this would take way too much effort.

    Given from the infographic they didn't even think about an algorithm let alone worked on it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    How do you know it's implemented as described in the picture?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I already explained how I know. So you can answer my question or just dodge?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children)

    It actually is on account that it's real world experience that gives me insight into how algorithms are done. Expertise you don't have

    I'm not worried about credibility since I look more credible than you because you flipped a question and never answered how you know

    So buddy you gonna prove the algorithm in loop works exactly like it does in the picture or give me the W?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    Nope asking you to prove that the algorithm works like it does in the picture.

    I don't helping you understand super basic things

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I'll explain it if you admit my points are right and your too ignorant on this subject to argue with me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Well the code is published on github for you to review. I'm sure you can find the functions and variables the digest them in your head to match them to the blocks in the picture

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Well you take your L and move on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry it's on you to prove it not me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    What's too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    oh lord your looking for a fight. i tell you this i kinda already won since your looking my input to criticize, but ill say this the personalized focus block alone. that's an exact "thing" and if you want more well your gonna have to ask more specific questions and your gonna demand that i help you.

    also I helped loops in the past. I can tell you that the GitHub code isn't the code that's used

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I can tell you that the GitHub code isn’t the code that’s used

    really? given that the license is AGPL and they do have some external contributors, they shouldn't be running an unpublished branch of the code!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)