you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

LibreWolf will likely be a good replacement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    My biggest problem with these forks is they’re still reliant on Firefox itself.

    I feel like we need a clean break.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    WebKit (e.g. GNOME Web, vimb, surf) is always there, and Servo is coming on leaps and bounds.

    Also, for your consideration, there are:

    • w3m (text-based, but supports displaying images with sixel, kitty, or framebuffer)
    • Links2 (surprisingly usable)
    • Dillo (better engine, but less features)
    • NetSurf (better again, but you can't use a custom search engine and the JS engine doesn't seem to work)
    • Chawan (text-based, but actually supports modern HTML and CSS; can display images using sixel or kitty; also supports gemini[^1])
    • Ladybird (bad dev, good product)
    • Stargate & Duckling (HTTP to Gemini[^1] proxies, so you can browse the web with Lagrange)
    • Pale Moon & Basilisk (based on a fork of Gecko; still use XUL; may be a bit less secure, but disable JS and you might be alright)

    Of course Librewolf, Waterfox, Tor Browser, ans Mullvad Browser are doing their best to resist the bullshit.


    [^1]: The network protocol; not the LLM.

  • source
  • parent