you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I wonder whether solutions like Twincat for industrial PC/PLCs will be affected by this. Interfacing directly with the kernel and replacing the scheduler are, AFAIK, fundamental to making Windows viable for real time use.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    An interesting question. Assuming they're only targeting security/antivirus products at the moment (see the discussion regarding anti-cheat) it may be that those applications get a pass for now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No I think they are limiting kernel access. These are just what moist people know that would use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I'm just speculating. It seems like, at least at the moment, anti cheat continues to be able to run as kernel. The article says Microsoft will have more to say on anti cheat "in the near future."

    It may be that they don't crack down on the realtime applications as hard, since the number of users impacted is so much smaller. Antivirus and anti cheat are on many millions of machines and are usable by the average consumer. Specialty software may be considered differently, I. E. "You know what you're doing and what risks you're assuming" for the more technical customer.

    It will be interesting to see where they go with this.

  • source
  • parent