▲ 569 ▼ A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It (www.404media.co) submitted 11 months ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Devial@discuss.online 187 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (26 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 26 child comments replies: [–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 23 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'm being a bit extra but... Your statement: The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie. The article headline: A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It The general story in reference to the headline: He found csam in a known AI dataset, a dataset which he stored in his account. Google banned him for having this data in his account. The article mentions that he tripped the automated monitoring tools. The article headline is accurate if you interpret it as "A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "csam"). The article headline is inaccurate if you interpret it as "A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "reporting csam"). I read it as the former, because the action of reporting isn't listed in the headline at all. ^___^ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (-1 children) This is correct. However, many websites/newspapers/magazines/etc. love to get more clicks with sensational headlines that are technically true, but can be easily interpreted as something much more sinister/exciting. This headline is a great example of it. While you interpreted it correctly, or claim to at least, there will be many people that initially interpret it the second way you described. Me among them, admittedly. And the people deciding on the headlines are very much aware of that. Therefore, the headline can absolutely be deemed misleading, for while it is absolutely a correct statement, there are less ambiguous ways to phrase it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments replies: [–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 point 11 months ago (-1 children) It is a terrible headline. It can be debated whether it's intentionally misleading, but if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago The inclusion of "found" indicates that it is important to the action taken by Google, would be my interpretation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago* (2 children) Another point is, the reason Google's AI is able to identify CSAM is because it has that in its training data, flagged as such. In that case, it would have detected the training material as ~100% match. I don't get though, how it ended up being openly available as if it were properly tagged, they would probably exclude it from the open-sourced data. And now I see it would also not be viable to have an open-source, openly scrutinisable AI deployment for CSAM detection for the same reason. And while some governmental body got a lot of backlash for trying to implement such an AI thing on chat stuff, Google gets to do so all it wants because it's E-Mail/GDrive and all on their servers and you can't expect privacy. Considering how many such stories of people having problems due to this system is coming up, is there any statistic of legitimate catches using this model? I suspect not, because why would anyone use Google services for this kind of stuff? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arararagi@ani.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You would think, but none of these companies actually make their own dataset, they buy from third parties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago I am not sure which point you are answering to. COuld you please specify. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie. A 404Media headline? The place exclusively staffed by former BuzzFeed/Cracked employees? Noooo, couldn’t be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago so they got mad because he reported it to an agency that actually fights csam instead of them so they can sweep it under the rug? permalink fedilink source parent replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone -5 points 11 months ago (-1 children) they obviously did if they banned him for it; and if they're training on csam and refuse to do anything about it then yeah they have a connection to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -21 points 11 months ago (11 children) We need to block access to the web to certain known actors and tie ipaddresses to IDs, names, passport number. For the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago (2 children) Oh hell no. That's a privacy nightmare to he abused like hell. Also that wouldn't work at all what you say. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -7 points 11 months ago (1 child) In the current digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second; preserved in all it's tritness, never fading, always accessible; rumors of petty issues, misinterpretations, slander. All junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate, it will only slow down social progress. The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards development of convenient half-truths. Just look at the strange juxtaposition of morality around us. Billions spent on new weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of their own victims. Although there are people in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species; everyone grows up being told what to do. "Be nice to other people." "But beat out the competition." "You're special, believe in yourself and you will succeed". But it's obvious from the start that only a few can succeed. You exercise your right to freedom and this is the result. All the rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdrawals into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum; they stay inside their little ponds leaking what ever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh, no one is invalidated but no one is right. Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "Truth". And this is the way the world ends. Not with a BANG, but with a... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago Is this a fresh new copypasta, or are you just a really long-winded, elaborate troll? permalink fedilink source parent [–] tetris11@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago Also, pay me exhorbitant amounts of tax-payer money to ineffectually enforce this. For the children. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago (5 children) Fuck you, and everything you stand for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 11 months ago (4 children) That sounds like sarcasm to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (3 children) People on Lemmy don't understand sarcasm because they have brain damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago No need to go that far. If we just require one valid photo ID for TikTok, the children will finally be safe. permalink fedilink source parent [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -31 points 11 months ago (7 children) CSAM images ATM machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 11 months ago (3 children) CSAM stands for "material". Adding "image" specifies what kind of material it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) A "material image" doesn't make any sense. An image is material. It should be CSAI if you wanna be specific. I don't know why this is the second time I've had a discussion about CSAM being a stupid acronym on Lemmy, but it's also the only place I've ever seen people use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Material. Type of material: Image permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent [+] Devial@discuss.online 10 points 11 months ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Material. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 23 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'm being a bit extra but... Your statement: The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie. The article headline: A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It The general story in reference to the headline: He found csam in a known AI dataset, a dataset which he stored in his account. Google banned him for having this data in his account. The article mentions that he tripped the automated monitoring tools. The article headline is accurate if you interpret it as "A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "csam"). The article headline is inaccurate if you interpret it as "A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "reporting csam"). I read it as the former, because the action of reporting isn't listed in the headline at all. ^___^ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (-1 children) This is correct. However, many websites/newspapers/magazines/etc. love to get more clicks with sensational headlines that are technically true, but can be easily interpreted as something much more sinister/exciting. This headline is a great example of it. While you interpreted it correctly, or claim to at least, there will be many people that initially interpret it the second way you described. Me among them, admittedly. And the people deciding on the headlines are very much aware of that. Therefore, the headline can absolutely be deemed misleading, for while it is absolutely a correct statement, there are less ambiguous ways to phrase it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments replies: [–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 point 11 months ago (-1 children) It is a terrible headline. It can be debated whether it's intentionally misleading, but if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago The inclusion of "found" indicates that it is important to the action taken by Google, would be my interpretation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (-1 children) This is correct. However, many websites/newspapers/magazines/etc. love to get more clicks with sensational headlines that are technically true, but can be easily interpreted as something much more sinister/exciting. This headline is a great example of it. While you interpreted it correctly, or claim to at least, there will be many people that initially interpret it the second way you described. Me among them, admittedly. And the people deciding on the headlines are very much aware of that. Therefore, the headline can absolutely be deemed misleading, for while it is absolutely a correct statement, there are less ambiguous ways to phrase it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments replies: [–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 point 11 months ago (-1 children) It is a terrible headline. It can be debated whether it's intentionally misleading, but if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 point 11 months ago (-1 children) It is a terrible headline. It can be debated whether it's intentionally misleading, but if the debate is even possible then the writing is awful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago The inclusion of "found" indicates that it is important to the action taken by Google, would be my interpretation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago* (2 children) Another point is, the reason Google's AI is able to identify CSAM is because it has that in its training data, flagged as such. In that case, it would have detected the training material as ~100% match. I don't get though, how it ended up being openly available as if it were properly tagged, they would probably exclude it from the open-sourced data. And now I see it would also not be viable to have an open-source, openly scrutinisable AI deployment for CSAM detection for the same reason. And while some governmental body got a lot of backlash for trying to implement such an AI thing on chat stuff, Google gets to do so all it wants because it's E-Mail/GDrive and all on their servers and you can't expect privacy. Considering how many such stories of people having problems due to this system is coming up, is there any statistic of legitimate catches using this model? I suspect not, because why would anyone use Google services for this kind of stuff? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arararagi@ani.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You would think, but none of these companies actually make their own dataset, they buy from third parties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago I am not sure which point you are answering to. COuld you please specify. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arararagi@ani.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You would think, but none of these companies actually make their own dataset, they buy from third parties. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago I am not sure which point you are answering to. COuld you please specify. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 point 11 months ago I am not sure which point you are answering to. COuld you please specify. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie. A 404Media headline? The place exclusively staffed by former BuzzFeed/Cracked employees? Noooo, couldn’t be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago so they got mad because he reported it to an agency that actually fights csam instead of them so they can sweep it under the rug? permalink fedilink source parent replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone -5 points 11 months ago (-1 children) they obviously did if they banned him for it; and if they're training on csam and refuse to do anything about it then yeah they have a connection to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Devial@discuss.online 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone -5 points 11 months ago (-1 children) they obviously did if they banned him for it; and if they're training on csam and refuse to do anything about it then yeah they have a connection to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone -5 points 11 months ago (-1 children) they obviously did if they banned him for it; and if they're training on csam and refuse to do anything about it then yeah they have a connection to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow -1 child comments load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -21 points 11 months ago (11 children) We need to block access to the web to certain known actors and tie ipaddresses to IDs, names, passport number. For the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago (2 children) Oh hell no. That's a privacy nightmare to he abused like hell. Also that wouldn't work at all what you say. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -7 points 11 months ago (1 child) In the current digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second; preserved in all it's tritness, never fading, always accessible; rumors of petty issues, misinterpretations, slander. All junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate, it will only slow down social progress. The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards development of convenient half-truths. Just look at the strange juxtaposition of morality around us. Billions spent on new weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of their own victims. Although there are people in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species; everyone grows up being told what to do. "Be nice to other people." "But beat out the competition." "You're special, believe in yourself and you will succeed". But it's obvious from the start that only a few can succeed. You exercise your right to freedom and this is the result. All the rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdrawals into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum; they stay inside their little ponds leaking what ever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh, no one is invalidated but no one is right. Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "Truth". And this is the way the world ends. Not with a BANG, but with a... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago Is this a fresh new copypasta, or are you just a really long-winded, elaborate troll? permalink fedilink source parent [–] tetris11@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago Also, pay me exhorbitant amounts of tax-payer money to ineffectually enforce this. For the children. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago (5 children) Fuck you, and everything you stand for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 11 months ago (4 children) That sounds like sarcasm to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (3 children) People on Lemmy don't understand sarcasm because they have brain damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago No need to go that far. If we just require one valid photo ID for TikTok, the children will finally be safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago (2 children) Oh hell no. That's a privacy nightmare to he abused like hell. Also that wouldn't work at all what you say. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -7 points 11 months ago (1 child) In the current digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second; preserved in all it's tritness, never fading, always accessible; rumors of petty issues, misinterpretations, slander. All junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate, it will only slow down social progress. The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards development of convenient half-truths. Just look at the strange juxtaposition of morality around us. Billions spent on new weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of their own victims. Although there are people in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species; everyone grows up being told what to do. "Be nice to other people." "But beat out the competition." "You're special, believe in yourself and you will succeed". But it's obvious from the start that only a few can succeed. You exercise your right to freedom and this is the result. All the rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdrawals into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum; they stay inside their little ponds leaking what ever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh, no one is invalidated but no one is right. Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "Truth". And this is the way the world ends. Not with a BANG, but with a... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago Is this a fresh new copypasta, or are you just a really long-winded, elaborate troll? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cybersteel@lemmy.world -7 points 11 months ago (1 child) In the current digitized world, trivial information is accumulating every second; preserved in all it's tritness, never fading, always accessible; rumors of petty issues, misinterpretations, slander. All junk data preserved in an unfiltered state, growing at an alarming rate, it will only slow down social progress. The digital society furthers human flaws and selectively rewards development of convenient half-truths. Just look at the strange juxtaposition of morality around us. Billions spent on new weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of their own victims. Although there are people in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species; everyone grows up being told what to do. "Be nice to other people." "But beat out the competition." "You're special, believe in yourself and you will succeed". But it's obvious from the start that only a few can succeed. You exercise your right to freedom and this is the result. All the rhetoric to avoid conflict and protect each other from hurt. The untested truths spun by different interests continue to churn and accumulate in the sandbox of political correctness and value systems. Everyone withdrawals into their own small gated community, afraid of a larger forum; they stay inside their little ponds leaking what ever "truth" suits them into the growing cesspool of society at large. The different cardinal truths neither clash nor mesh, no one is invalidated but no one is right. Not even natural selection can take place here. The world is being engulfed in "Truth". And this is the way the world ends. Not with a BANG, but with a... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago Is this a fresh new copypasta, or are you just a really long-winded, elaborate troll? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago Is this a fresh new copypasta, or are you just a really long-winded, elaborate troll? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago Also, pay me exhorbitant amounts of tax-payer money to ineffectually enforce this. For the children. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago (5 children) Fuck you, and everything you stand for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 11 months ago (4 children) That sounds like sarcasm to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (3 children) People on Lemmy don't understand sarcasm because they have brain damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 11 months ago (4 children) That sounds like sarcasm to me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (3 children) People on Lemmy don't understand sarcasm because they have brain damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] x0x7@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (3 children) People on Lemmy don't understand sarcasm because they have brain damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) including you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Apparently you didn't get the sarcasm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 11 months ago I don't see the sarcasm in your comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago No need to go that far. If we just require one valid photo ID for TikTok, the children will finally be safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -31 points 11 months ago (7 children) CSAM images ATM machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 11 months ago (3 children) CSAM stands for "material". Adding "image" specifies what kind of material it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) A "material image" doesn't make any sense. An image is material. It should be CSAI if you wanna be specific. I don't know why this is the second time I've had a discussion about CSAM being a stupid acronym on Lemmy, but it's also the only place I've ever seen people use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Material. Type of material: Image permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent [+] Devial@discuss.online 10 points 11 months ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Material. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 11 months ago (3 children) CSAM stands for "material". Adding "image" specifies what kind of material it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) A "material image" doesn't make any sense. An image is material. It should be CSAI if you wanna be specific. I don't know why this is the second time I've had a discussion about CSAM being a stupid acronym on Lemmy, but it's also the only place I've ever seen people use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Material. Type of material: Image permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) A "material image" doesn't make any sense. An image is material. It should be CSAI if you wanna be specific. I don't know why this is the second time I've had a discussion about CSAM being a stupid acronym on Lemmy, but it's also the only place I've ever seen people use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Material. Type of material: Image permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Material. Type of material: Image permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago Why say sexual abuse material images, which is grammatically incorrect, instead of sexual abuse images, which is what you mean, and shorter? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Devial@discuss.online 10 points 11 months ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Material. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] bobzer@lemmy.zip -6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Material. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Devial@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago (2 children) You're right. It can be images, that's exactly why saying "this man was found in possession of child abuse material images" does not make grammatical sense. It's why CP still defines it better as we're not arresting people for owning copies of Lolita, which you could argue is also CSAM. the majority of people disagree with you. The majority of people can be wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Devial@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) "I'm mad you're right so let me compare you to a hateful right wing grifter and also by the way, you're wrong because all my friends say so." It may shock you but a handful of Lemmy users doesn't constitute the linguistic consensus you're trying to inherit here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Devial@discuss.online 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago* Sorry. To address your two points, where did people get the idea that the word porn implies artistic merit or consent? It simply means material intended to sexually excite people. Is that meaning not important to retain as it's the difference between what we consider CSAM and a picture of your kid in the tub? CP can stand for a lot of things but it's common parlance now. CSAM just causes confusion. Also really? Now you're stooping to the old "why so mad bro?". You're the one having a meltdown, I'm wasting time at work by sharing an opinion. permalink fedilink source parent