you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

Eh I disagree with the power usage point, specifically. Don’t listen to Altman lie through his teeth; generation and training should be dirt cheap.

See the recent Z Image, which was trained on a shoestring budget and costs basically nothing to run: https://arxiv.org/html/2511.22699v2

The task energy per image is less than what it took for me to type out this comment.


As for if we “need” it, yeah, that’s a good point and what I was curious about.

But then again… I don’t get why people use a lot of porn services. As an example, I just don’t see the appeal of OF, yet it’s a colossal enterprise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    $628.000 is not exactly shoestring budget.

    Maybe not as much as others are using but I would say by far the most university research groups couldn't afford that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago*

    Not in terms of energy use, ~110 Megawatt hours. Even if you multiply that for production costs, test training runs and such, its less energy than an airline flight, or the yearly power consumption of a few homes. And it only needed to be done once.

    It's not a trivial financial cost though, no.

  • source
  • parent