I mean, I guess? Kinda?

You said you didn't know the specific on the bombs dropped.
Ok, so 0 information on the bomb dropped.

But that Chernobyl created a massive cloud of fallout that impacted neighbouring countries and caused acid rain.
Well, that's true. But that wasn't a fusion explosion.

So, it felt like you were trying to relate 2 unrelated things. Like an apples-to-oranges situation.

I feel that I clarified that the bombs dropped were designed to converted all fusable material to energy. They were literally designed to weaponise fusion.
And that the fallout from Chernobyl wasn't caused by material turning into energy (ie fusion), but from particle dispersion.

So, I guess.
In that you said you had 0 knowledge of Thing A, and stated an unrelated fact about Thing B. Where both things are true, and are related by the fact that nuclear fuel is involved. But that's as far as the relationships go

But everything you said after "yes" does nothing to support the "yes"