38
"This still does not compare to the kind of audience we would have on Steam": Horses lead says ban virality helped sales "but we're not out of the woods," and he fears "self-censorship" with future... (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Steam is a publisher that is free to decide what is or is not allowed on their platform. Everyone is free to choose not to use Steam, just as everyone is free to choose not to play Horses, and platforms are free to not host it. Why should Steam be forced to host it if they have decided not to?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -8 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    No one suggested forcing Steam to do anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    The comment I was replying to mentioned being against censorship and hoping the game gets put back up on a Steam. While they didn't say anything about Steam being forced to do anything, I was just following that train of thought to any pressure being put on Steam to put it back on. They have no reason to reverse the decision.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent