Looks so real !

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 11 months ago (6 children)

As long as we can't even define sapience in biological life, where it resides and how it works, it's pointless to try and apply those terms to AI. We don't know how natural intelligence works, so using what little we know about it to define something completely different is counterintuitive.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    We don't know what causes gravity, or how it works, either. But you can measure it, define it, and even create a law with a very precise approximation of what would happen when gravity is involved.

    I don't think LLMs will create intelligence, but I don't think we need to solve everything about human intelligence before having machine intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Though in the case of consciousness - the fact of there being something it's like to be - not only don't we know what causes it or how it works, but we have no way of measuring it either. There's zero evidence for it in the entire universe outside of our own subjective experience of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago

    To be fair there's zero evidence for anything outside our own subjective experience of it, we're just kind of running with the assumption that our subjective experience is an accurate representation of reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)