you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I actually liked that Archer was so often out of his depth and had to put on a false confidence. It'd be weird if Starfleet just immediately hit the ground running with an absolute heavyweight of a captain like Picard or something.

I feel like it was a purposeful character choice to have him bumbling around, not really sure what the fuck he was doing, but having to act as if he did for the sake of the crew.

He's meant to be somewhat bad at his job, and regularly confidently incorrect.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Not to mention that a lot of his actions become the basis for which the Prime Directive is created. Dude was a bit less "cowboy diplomacy" and more straightforward "cowboy" with decision making.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment