This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

The safety features are worth millions of crashes prevented and thousands of lives saved, making them remarkably cost-effective.

Capping the luxury features and size of passenger vehicles would do a lot more to bring down costs than removing safety features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Unless they only permitted that screen to show a rear view. They could have prohibited any other use, or prohibited non-tactile controls that required ocular attention while driving. They could have required that touchscreen controls be disabled while driving. But they didn't.

They mandated the distracting screen, and probably killed more people than they saved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    The law doesn’t mandate a touch screen, nor that it be on while driving. And why should it? The goal is to address the blind spot, not to tell automakers how to build head units.

  • source
  • parent