49
Git 3.0 will use main as the default branch (thoughtbot.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Git borrowed the term “master” from BitKeeper, the proprietary tool the Linux kernel used before Git existed.

In BitKeeper, a “master repository” referred to the authoritative repository in a set of distributed clones. When Linus Torvalds created Git in 2005, he followed that naming convention and called the primary branch “master”.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Should have followed Subversion so we'd have "trunk" with the branches coming off it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    The trunk metaphor doesn’t work very well in Git, because branches aren’t long-lived containers of sequential commits the way they are in SVN. There is no “root” commit that is guaranteed to have a consistent relationship with main, because branches are just names attached to a commit and can be reassigned at will.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    huh I always assumed it was just taken from how HDD's used to work back in the way if you ran multiple on your machine. you had to designated on the motherboard and/or HDD which hard drive was the "Master" and which was the "Slave"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent