you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

All of those countries are capitalist, though, how do they invalidate my point about post-Soviet countries?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    You're the one who connected falling birth rates to safety nets, childcare and community. I was simply providing evidence that those things don't necessarily translate to an increase in birth rates as might be expected

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I think you accidentally fell face first into my point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    What about China and Cuba?

    You also haven't drawn a link to how those drops were directly caused by capitalist policies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago

    Okay the argument is that the lack of social safety nets and childcare causes a decline in birth rates. Right?

    Your argument is that the transition from socialism to capitalism is directly linked to a drop in birth rates? I assume in this particular case you mean the loss of free childcare and social safety nets leads women to avoid having children?

    So, in capitalist countries where there is subsidised/ free childcare and more developed safety nets should correspond to an increase in birth rates?

    And to expand on that, socialist countries such as China and Cuba should show an increase in birth rates. An i getting this right or am I missing your point

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)