I honestly don't know how people can be so judgmental about a technology. AI is just a tool that can be sometimes be very helpful if you trust the users' critical thinking skills and the ability to smell bullshit. Most of the problems associated with AI are just a consequence of shitty business models and a mediocre mode of production (Capitalism) "Judging by what I see in the comments on the posts about Firefox’s potential AI feature integrations, the apparent path that critics are recommending as an alternative browser is “I’ll yell at you until you stop using ChatGPT”. Consider this post my official notice: that strategy hasn’t worked. And it is not going to work. The only thing that will work is to offer a better alternative to these users. That will involve defining what an acceptably “good” alternative AI looks like, and then building and shipping it to these users, and convincing them to use it. I’m hoping such an effort succeeds. But I can guarantee that scolding people and trying to convince them that they’re not finding utility in the current platforms, or trying to make them feel guilty about the fact that they are finding utility in the current platforms, will not work.And none of this is exculpatory for my friends at Mozilla. As I’ve said to the good people there, and will share again here, I don’t think the framing of the way this feature has been presented has done either the Firefox team or the community any favors. These big, emotional blow-ups are demoralizing, and take away time and energy and attention that could be better spent getting people excited and motivated to grow for the future."anildash.com/2025/11/14/wantin#AI #GenerativeAI #Mozilla #Firefox #AIBrowser #OpenAI #ChatGPT

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

@remixtures "the truth is that the fact that ChatGPT has become the 5th most visited Web site in the world" - which ISN'T a statistic, but a total, as I have been pointing out to you the whole time. Don't try to gaslight a statistician"is extremely significant" - no it isn't. "Significant" has a specific meaning in statistics, and ChatGPT fails miserably on that count"in terms of user adoption, it represents" - less than 1 in 10 people, as I already said

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago

    @SmartmanApps I don't have any intention of continuing with this discussion. Internet users have adopted LLM-based chatbots in a way that can be compared to a few online services. Besides ChatGPT in 5th, there's also Gemini in 30th: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_. None of these sites appeared in the same list two years ago: en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t.

  • source
  • parent