[–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

@remixtures "the truth is that the fact that ChatGPT has become the 5th most visited Web site in the world" - which ISN'T a statistic, but a total, as I have been pointing out to you the whole time. Don't try to gaslight a statistician"is extremely significant" - no it isn't. "Significant" has a specific meaning in statistics, and ChatGPT fails miserably on that count"in terms of user adoption, it represents" - less than 1 in 10 people, as I already said

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    @remixtures "but if the growth rate continues" - I see you've already abandoned your "tiny percentage" argument then, and switched to "in the future, if these trends continue, it will be a tiny percentage, maybe"."must have hundreds of millions of users only in China" - which is STILL only 1 or 2 in 10. 🙄

    None

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (7 children)

    @remixtures And where's the number of visitors to the NoChatGPT website to compare that number to? Oh yeah, there isn't one, thus you can't claim it's a "tiny percentage" without numbers to calculate the percentage (which there aren't).What we CAN compare that number to, say the 700,000,000 weekly active users, is the world population of more than 10 times that number, so in a given week, less than 1 in 10 people use ChatGPT, at all. If you want to talk tiny percentage...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (9 children)

    @remixtures "Just give people the “shut off all AI features” button. It’s a tiny percentage of people who want it" - no it isn't, hence the plethora of articles about "How to turn of AI in (tool)". Just this morning there was one in my feed about how to turn it off in gmail (the articles are needed because the option - when the option exists at all - is hidden away so as not to be easily findable).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›