Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

The ML definition of "imperialism" is "an advanced form of capitalism". It conviently excludes anything Russia has ever done. It also excludes the British East India Company, but they don't think about that.

Edit: if any of you tankies want to post that I'm making shit up again, then you ought to read more from Uncle Joe Steel. Not my fault his shitty propaganda made a huge definitional blunder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I think if a definition of imperialism excludes the EAST INDIA COMPANY, something is fucked up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    No, I actually read shit.

    "Marx did in fact concede that possibility, and he had good grounds for conceding it in regard to Britain and America in the seventies of the last century, when monopoly capitalism and imperialism did not yet exist, and when these countries, owing to the particular conditions of their development, had as yet no developed militarism and bureaucracy."

    • Foundations of Leninism, ch 4

    If imperialism hadn't existed in the 1870s, then the definition couldn't have covered the East India Company in its hayday.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)