This is a case where I don't really think machine translation does it justice, but taking the translation at its word:

Hamdan : The Palestinian factions, including Hamas, have in recent days exerted great efforts in political communications to secure a resolution that would define the international force’s main mission as protecting the Palestinian people from aggression and preventing genocide from being repeated, and that such forces be deployed along the lines of contact around Gaza, between the Strip and the territories occupied in 1948. We conducted contacts with most members of the Security Council—both permanent and non-permanent members. We also communicated with the Arab and Islamic groups about this matter and submitted a detailed memorandum responding to this resolution or proposal at the time, clarifying its danger to the Palestinian cause and its negative repercussions on the international system and international law. We hope that what we and other factions have submitted will be reflected in the Council’s corridors before the vote, and that its impact will appear in a resolution that does justice to the Palestinian people and protects them from occupation and the genocide the Zionist entity has committed over the past two years.

We have a few key problems here. The resolution that was drafted obviously does not protect the Palestinian people from aggression, and the alternative drafted by Russia and China is not being accepted by the western powers. Despite China and Russia's efforts to change the resolution, including alternate proposals, the resolution that was decided by the western powers was what was voted on.

Secondly, Hamas requested that they hoped what they and other factions submitted would be considered in the vote, and that is exactly what happened. The PA supported the resolution, and yet China and Russia did not vote to pass it. Instead, countries like Algeria voted for it alongside the US.

Third, is the protection from genocide line. The US opened the talks with threats of heightened genocide should the resolution be vetoed. This isn't an empty threat. The US made it clear, either they will bomb the shit out of Palestine, or they will proceed with the plan. Returning to point 1, the alternatives presented by China and Russia were denied, and the draft was rushed.

In short, a veto would have resulted in escalated conflict, a vote for would have resulted in full acceptance and a commitment to the colonial project, and an abstention would have resulted in the resolution passing but with the express disapproval of China and Russia, alongside their soon to come alternative propositions. China and Russia maintain the position of the two state solution and China in particular has stated that Palestine must be governed by Palestinians, and is willing to step in and make that happen if consensus among those in charge of Palestine is reached.

There was no easy, correct answer given the requests from MENA countries and PA, and the threats of the US to escalate the genocide after a hard fought ceasefire, however weak, was reached.