▲ 200 ▼ Steam Hardware Announcement (www.youtube.com) submitted 1 year ago by sirico@feddit.uk to c/technology@lemmy.world 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) No, I meant precisely what I wrote. The point being that if it were $4, “underpowered” would be an absurd way to describe it, because value is a function of cost versus benefit, where benefit is subjective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) No, I meant precisely what I wrote. The point being that if it were $4, “underpowered” would be an absurd way to describe it, because value is a function of cost versus benefit, where benefit is subjective. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (2 children) Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Suggesting something open to doubt isn’t debatable is just not knowing what the word means. There are dictionaries available to the public. Suggesting the device is underpowered in all contexts is just silly. If I want a device to play Stardew Valley, Braid or some other game with very different people requirements than Cyberpunk, it may not be underpowered… to me. I get that you’re one of those people that just can never ever accept they are maybe making an objective statement about a subjective value, but you should introspect a bit. You said it wasn’t debatable. We have debated. I doubt your position. End of story. If you want to compare this to flat earth, fine. Rest assured, nobody will likely find and follow this thread. FWIW, I think I probably agree with some of your sentiment. It would be better if more powerful. It is underpowered for many of the modern generation of games, etc. Not for you. No problem. Maybe others will like it. ¯\(ツ)/¯ permalink fedilink source parent