83
Why go through the trouble to use Arch? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

May be a mean sounding question, but I’m genuinely wondering why people would choose Arch/Endevour/whatever (NOT on steam hardware) over another all-in-one distro related to Fedora or Ubuntu. Is it shown that there are significant performance benefits to installing daemons and utilities à la carte? Is there something else I’m missing? Is it because arch users are enthusiasts that enjoy trying to optimize their system?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago

Honestly it's the most problem-free distribution I've used. I've used fedora, ubuntu, opensuse, and they all are way easier to break and way harder to fix. Once you get arch working it works really reliably and when it occasionally breaks it's easy to fix. I used nixos for a while, and it is more reliable but it's just a little too much effort.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •