Sad but true
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Part of me wonders, if the government just bought out a bunch of gyms and made them free for public use. Would the additional people now using the gyms and living healthier save the government long term on healthcare?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You're basically describing a park. And we have tons of parks all over the country. They are regularly full of people going out to use them for exercise and entertainment. Idk if there's a correlation between "distance from a public park" and "health outcomes of local residents". But they're attractive amenities that people tend to enjoy, even without a numerical cost-savings figure you can use to justify their expense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe, I do think there's a difference. A gym exists solely for exercise and clearly people prefer to use them over parks and I assume the health return for time spent is greater for dedicated gyms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments