▲ 489 ▼ Rest is a legacy feature I had deprecated (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by ivanafterall@lemmy.world to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 1 year ago (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 year ago* (6 children) 24 y/o, 3 majors in CS, economics and another thing. Founder. The fact that it's a 30h flight. It has fuckery all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children) Unless he has flying to Kansas or something the flight length is complete bullshit. Looks like its 17-19 hours for west coast airports and at most 22 hours for nyc or Boston permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 16 points 1 year ago* (3 children) If he had multiple layovers he could hit 30 hours flight time. However you’re right, a nonstop flight from NYC to Saigon is only like 20 hours or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Amsterdam - Rome - Perth is something like 17 hours on the long part, but the one time I did it I spent 11 hours on the Amsterdam - Rome part due to engine trouble. and that's still not 30 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* Sometimes things happen. A lot of the times, actually. Edit: way too many times permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 year ago* (6 children) 24 y/o, 3 majors in CS, economics and another thing. Founder. The fact that it's a 30h flight. It has fuckery all around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children) Unless he has flying to Kansas or something the flight length is complete bullshit. Looks like its 17-19 hours for west coast airports and at most 22 hours for nyc or Boston permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 16 points 1 year ago* (3 children) If he had multiple layovers he could hit 30 hours flight time. However you’re right, a nonstop flight from NYC to Saigon is only like 20 hours or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Amsterdam - Rome - Perth is something like 17 hours on the long part, but the one time I did it I spent 11 hours on the Amsterdam - Rome part due to engine trouble. and that's still not 30 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* Sometimes things happen. A lot of the times, actually. Edit: way too many times permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children) Unless he has flying to Kansas or something the flight length is complete bullshit. Looks like its 17-19 hours for west coast airports and at most 22 hours for nyc or Boston permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 16 points 1 year ago* (3 children) If he had multiple layovers he could hit 30 hours flight time. However you’re right, a nonstop flight from NYC to Saigon is only like 20 hours or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Amsterdam - Rome - Perth is something like 17 hours on the long part, but the one time I did it I spent 11 hours on the Amsterdam - Rome part due to engine trouble. and that's still not 30 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@piefed.social 16 points 1 year ago* (3 children) If he had multiple layovers he could hit 30 hours flight time. However you’re right, a nonstop flight from NYC to Saigon is only like 20 hours or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Amsterdam - Rome - Perth is something like 17 hours on the long part, but the one time I did it I spent 11 hours on the Amsterdam - Rome part due to engine trouble. and that's still not 30 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Amsterdam - Rome - Perth is something like 17 hours on the long part, but the one time I did it I spent 11 hours on the Amsterdam - Rome part due to engine trouble. and that's still not 30 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) I flew NYC to Seoul a few times (also the reverse flight) and that one is about the same flight time. Never again will I willingly fly to the other side of the planet. Not without month long stops between each 3000 miles or so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago See, your problem is not having a bunch of someone else's money to burn so that you can fly first class. Economy for 20 hours is agony thanks to the cramped seating. Probably wouldn't be so bad if we could bring back the 747 design that had a passenger lounge in the upper level. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 point 1 year ago* Sometimes things happen. A lot of the times, actually. Edit: way too many times permalink fedilink source parent