▲ 89 ▼ ChatGPT "Absolutely Wrecked" at Chess by Atari 2600 Console From 1977 (futurism.com) submitted 1 year ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 57 points 1 year ago (11 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago (4 children) Its because of all the people saying that LLMs can reason and think and the human brain works just like an LLM and... some other ridiculous claim. This shows some limitations on LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Human brains lose to computerized chess all the time, though. So I guess this is a win for AI tech bros? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why the special qualifier of "computerized" chess? Do humans regularly lose to Atari's at chess? LLMs are computerized too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I meant a specialized application, like the Atari one that beat the LLM. permalink fedilink source parent [+] REDACTED@infosec.pub -6 points 1 year ago But humans not trained (made) for chess would make stupid mistakes too permalink fedilink source parent [–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Now apply this to like, everything else ever. Machine designed to convincingly fake human internet conversation sucks at ____________! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago ChatGPT can't make a rug as well as a 300 year old loom. permalink fedilink source parent [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago Why are so many people mad when it's pointed out that the shitty chatbots are just shitty chatbots. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago I knew there would be these kinds of comments making this obvious point. This is just a demo of how these language models are not going to achieve the "General" part of AGI. It's going to take a new paradigm permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Too many people forget that specialized, purpose-driven software is often if more effective and efficient. LLMs and other AI are nice when you don't have a properly defined spec or a flexible algorithm but you pay, literally, for the convenience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago 40 year old machine designed to play chess* permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago (4 children) Its because of all the people saying that LLMs can reason and think and the human brain works just like an LLM and... some other ridiculous claim. This shows some limitations on LLMs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Human brains lose to computerized chess all the time, though. So I guess this is a win for AI tech bros? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why the special qualifier of "computerized" chess? Do humans regularly lose to Atari's at chess? LLMs are computerized too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I meant a specialized application, like the Atari one that beat the LLM. permalink fedilink source parent [+] REDACTED@infosec.pub -6 points 1 year ago But humans not trained (made) for chess would make stupid mistakes too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Human brains lose to computerized chess all the time, though. So I guess this is a win for AI tech bros? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why the special qualifier of "computerized" chess? Do humans regularly lose to Atari's at chess? LLMs are computerized too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I meant a specialized application, like the Atari one that beat the LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Why the special qualifier of "computerized" chess? Do humans regularly lose to Atari's at chess? LLMs are computerized too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I meant a specialized application, like the Atari one that beat the LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I meant a specialized application, like the Atari one that beat the LLM. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] REDACTED@infosec.pub -6 points 1 year ago But humans not trained (made) for chess would make stupid mistakes too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Now apply this to like, everything else ever. Machine designed to convincingly fake human internet conversation sucks at ____________! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago ChatGPT can't make a rug as well as a 300 year old loom. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago ChatGPT can't make a rug as well as a 300 year old loom. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago Why are so many people mad when it's pointed out that the shitty chatbots are just shitty chatbots. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago I knew there would be these kinds of comments making this obvious point. This is just a demo of how these language models are not going to achieve the "General" part of AGI. It's going to take a new paradigm permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Too many people forget that specialized, purpose-driven software is often if more effective and efficient. LLMs and other AI are nice when you don't have a properly defined spec or a flexible algorithm but you pay, literally, for the convenience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago 40 year old machine designed to play chess* permalink fedilink source parent