Hope this is true for other states as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Thanks for sharing this. I kind of figured there would be some legal or strategic reason Justice Jackson would move this way. Seems she was stuck between a rock and a hard place and acted to try and enact the least worst option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    No problem, I thought the same. She's very consistent and I did not see her doing that unless there was an upside to it. Apparently, however, in the interim between my comment and yours the full court has decided and the SNAP funding is blocked anyway. Props to @silence7@slrpnk.net who first posted the link.

    Edited to correct and add: My bad, it was another reference to Justice Jackson's extended stay and the full court has NOT ruled yet. My apologies.

  • source
  • parent