Yah. That makes sense. After re-reading everything there are no aggressive statements; No explitives or insults. There's nothing in thewords themselves displaying anger.

However it is common for people to see disagreement or contention as a hostile attack. Especially when contesting a perceived morality. The only sensible reason I can see my words would appear angry to you, is that you're reading my words with your emotions and conflating the two.

So if I angered you in my questioning the validity of your moral condemnation, I apologize. It's a regrettable consequence. One that's common enough, I should have predicted it. I might have handled things differently if I had.

Even my previous comment you called passive agressive, was intended to be condescending. I could have softened that more.