101
Why do game devs keep making horrible Linux Ports? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm asking because I just bought Cronos: The New Dawn on Steam because it has a native Linux port. To be fair, I would have bought it at some point anyway but I got excited when I saw it had a Linux port. The game is missing features that the Windows version has, It runs horribly at any setting other than very low. I think they only bothered testing for the SteamDeck. But if that's the case, why does it support FSR 4.0? To be fair, the Windows version doesn't run amazing either if you enable ray tracing but it still performs way better than the Linux port. Why do devs keep doing this? I've bought many Linux games that have problems that the Windows versions don't have. Why even make a port if you're not going to bother testing or optimizing it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Linux gamers often say stuff like “it’s literally one toggle in [insert game engine here]” but that’s never the case. Doesn’t mean new devs don’t fall for it.

If developers (those that come from Windows) fall for anything, it's the myth that Proton is already perfect and native ports have no value.

With Steam Deck the hurdle for game developers to dog food native ports of their games is lower than ever. SteamOS comes with Podman and Distrobox, so installing the Steam Linux Runtime SDK on Steam Deck's desktop mode should be doable after reading a howto.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent