you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This doesn't appear normalized to cost increases, which might outpace the rate, which means theft is down. I seriously doubt half of all people are stealing food.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    45% of shoplifters steal food, not shoppers. I would guess the others are taking clothes, jewelry, electronics, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    With how omnipresent self checkouts have become, I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunk of customers have accidentally stolen something at least once a year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Maybe if we consider accidents. I don't really understand how they can even measure this in the first place, maybe a poll but that's very unreliable methodology and sample monitoring would need a crazy large N.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's probably just based off of normal shrinkage metrics that stores already collect anyway. If you could get target, Walmart, and Costco to give you their data, that'd be thousands of stores.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean they can tell you item counts missing and total value, but how are they counting percentage of patrons? Unless you are extrapolating from catching people and assuming some likelihood of being caught...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments