185
Study finds 72% of Developers View Steam as Monopoly [from the overall pool, 75% of respondents were senior managers] (steamdeckhq.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Valve is "de facto" monopoly, bit the actual monopoly potential is in Microsoft hands. Microsoft is for PC gaming industry what Google is for the web browser one. Sure, there may be other cool web browsers, but it's Google that (through Android base) decide whic web browser will be delivered with the next billions of Android mobile device: some elderly people on smartphone don't even know what is a web browser ("oh, you mean when I Google? I don't know: I just Google").

All future new PC will be sold with Microsoft Store and Xbox junk ware: Microsoft has been exceptionally shitty for not being the actual monopoly in the PC gaming industry. But that's a very feeble protection: break Valve business is just a mandatory "security update" away to happen. They can break Steam little by little (such as suggested by Tim Sweeney) or just a big blow by sheer monopolized manipulation (such as Google not allowing adblockers to chrome to feed their advertising business)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Microsoft tried to flip the switch years ago to kill anything outside the Microsoft store. That's when steam released the original steam machines. Combined with general negative response to the messaging Microsoft has backed off, but they absolutely want to do it still.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They never tried to kill anything outside the Microsoft store. That's just what Tim Sweeney and developers got fearful of and made a big fuss about (not saying it's not worth making a fuss about, but they never announced they would do it). Microsoft did introduce more limited versions of windows that had sideloading disabled by default, but these were low cost versions of windows generally aimed at children and grandparents / non tech people, not at their gamer user base.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They absolutely were heading that direction with both windows and Xbox until the massive backlash from the public forced them to tone down their plans. It's still the same company that tried to kill used games on consoles, and they basically have with the creation of game pass. Valve built an escape hatch to Linux for gaming, which has forced them to be a bit nicer on the PC front, but that's not a sign of Microsoft being good.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Lol, they didn't try to kill used games on console, when they announced the Xbox One they also announced that you would be able to digitally sell and transfer your games licenses and share you digital library with friends.

    Gamers didn't hear that though, and then those plans got scrapped when they had to rework everything before launch.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent