The Trump administration will undoubtedly appeal, possibly all the way to the Supreme Court. But for now, millions of people across the country will not have to make hard choices about how to feed themselves and their families. Several states that had already declared emergencies to tackle the impending crisis will have at least some temporary relief.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 15 points 1 year ago (25 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    I don’t think I understand the question. A judge ordered Trump to do something. Trump does not have to do any of that, because he appealed. I’m not sure entirely how this process works… But I can guarantee you zero money will be spent on snap until the Supreme Court makes its decision. If the Supreme Court makes the decision that Trump has to support snap, Trump will still not support snap. No one is going to reach into the pocket of the government and pull out the money. It is just not going to happen. Every single thing that you see is just a puppet show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Not arguing your conclusion, but to answer the question regarding the question

    Just appealing a ruling doesn't mean he doesn't have to follow the ruling. He still has to follow the ruling until a judge, any judge involved in the case, says that he doesn't have to follow the ruling as either a temporary stay of said ruling or a permanent judgement.

    So if he doesn't do as ordered (and I agree that he won't) he is 100% in violation of the law AND the judge's orders.

    But also he's immune to prosecution for official acts, so why should Trump give a shit about any of that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    God bless Lemmy for actually keeping this comment up lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Haha, I’m pretty surprised Jordan Lund has not removed this. It’s possible that this comment got lost in the mix and did not receive a lot of reports. Or maybe they are just receiving so many reports that there is a backlog lol.

    But thanks for your support! 🥰

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    What does "following the ruling" even look like? Does Trump have to cut a check for it? Is there some bureaucrat who pushes some buttons on a computer? Who will make either of those things happen? The courts have no enforcement arm. Congress has no enforcement arm. We're relying on American humans to follow the rules and I have given up hope on that happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (16 children)

    The judge ordered the administration to report back by Sunday or Monday night with plans on how it would happen.

    Actually two different judges in different states ruled this same way with the same requirement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    But… you know he has no intention of doing what a judge says, and there is nothing anyone can do—besides end trump’s life violently—to stop him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Then Democrats need to be on top of the messaging and make sure that everyone knows who is directly responsible for their hunger.

    So I'm not super optimistic...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    You keep saying that but I don’t see you doing anything. Stop trying to convince people to do something you don’t want to do yourself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Why? Why should I stop doing anything? Sure, I don’t have the skills to accomplish that job – But there are many people who do and just need that extra push. I do my fair share of things within my competence, but confessing those things on the Internet is a dumb idea.

    What it comes down to is you don’t want him to be dead. You enjoy what’s going on. You want it to continue. You’re a fed simp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    I don’t want to see you get someone stupid out in jail. Anyone who has the skills is not going to be listening to you. I have the skills and I think you’re stupid for saying that. I’m not going to do it because he’s not exactly thriving in life as it is. I’m pretty sure we can just wait it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You don’t have the skills. You’re a fucking joke. American hero Tommy Crooks is a better shot than you will ever be.

    He is going to live until his 90s. Which is More than a decade. The amount of permanent damage he can do in that time has clearly not caught up to you yet.

    I think you just don’t care what’s happening. I think you think it’s a good thing. You probably feel the right kind of people are suffering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think you make a lot of assumptions. I used evidence to make that conclusion. You are shouting nonsense over nothing.

    The only thing you know about me is that I think you are you are being very foolish for trying to convince people here on lemmy to attack a political figure.

    Again, anyone you convince would not be the person to actually do it. They’d just get themselves arrested.

    Regardless of anyone politics what you are doing is foolish and only gets people hurt.

    So stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I disagree. What you are doing is foolish and stupid. You are trying to shut down any conversation of fighting the government. Sounds like you’re just a fed troll. That explains why you would argue against anything actually effective.

    Remind me again what “evidence” you have presented here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    “trying to shut down any conversation of fighting the government.“

    Im shutting down exactly one kind of argument. Just your bad idea of trying to convince people to kill the president.

    Again it’s not even an issue of politics or my beliefs, it’s not even saying his death would be good or bad.

    I’m simply pointing out the obvious. Anyone who would be convinced by you here on lemmy saying they should do it… is the type of person to get immediately arrested and never even get within a mile of trump.

    Anyone with the skills already made up their mind. Either they are trying and you need to stop drawing attention to that, or they are like me and are pretty sure his mental and physical health will fail before a plan could reasonably take effect so why bother?

    That’s the facts of this. You’re being foolish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well… You are entitled to your opinion and I do not agree with pretty much every word that you said. Decision-making is fluid. Lots of people just aren’t angry enough yet. If I can help them get angrier, it’s only a win.

    Again… You are in favor of Donald Trump, and therefore there is no point in having this conversation. As you said before… You have the skills and you made your choice… And you chose Trump. I very very very much hope you get what’s coming to you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    lol I’m very clearly a democrat. I’m on here all the time making fun of trump.

    You are just being foolish. The idea that everything that’s happened wouldn’t be enough to anger someone but you saying basically “go do it” would convince them? What kind of person exactly would you be convincing.

    You must be a trump supporter by your own logic. You aren’t out there killing him so by your own admission you must be for trump. Right? That’s how that works? You must be maga.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    No, I said I didn’t have the skills. Nice try though, but your own reading comprehension skills have failed you.

    You have said anyone who has the skills has already made their decision. You also claim that you have the skills to take down the president of the United States… Something that I am skeptical of, but for the sake of this conversation I will believe that you believe.

    Keep on putting your foot in your mouth. You’ll change your tune pretty soon when Martial law hits… although, I expect to see you behind a mask wearing an ICE shirt.

  • source
  • parent