you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As an aside, a great deal of CSAM is shared through Facebook, they've been asked by CSAM survivors to stop this and they said no. The advocacy survivor group Phoenix 11 submitted six formal questions in the US Congress to old Zuckface fuckface about it, as he deployed end to end encryption which makes this possible, which he dodged like the lying fuck he is. Zuck would sell it himself if it made him a whole dollar and nobody should forget that.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I completely disagree with your take here.

    The idea that we shouldn't have services with end to end encryption because "think of the children" is an absurd take to have.

    I think you're being upvoted because its anti Zuckerberg, but seriously people, think about the long term consequences of not being able to chat without being spied on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Which is frustrating as every single time the government wanted to expand surveillance on regular citizens, preventing this is always touted as the justification. Now we have all the surveillance and the monopolies are like 'Nah, exploitation is profitable'.

  • source
  • parent