Monetization is often a struggle for big open-source projects, donations are nice but I think they often fall short.

Something to consider is to add Rewards people get if they donate, which they can then hand out to posts or comments that they like. I feel this could add a lot to PieFed and is a great feature to have.

The potential extra income from people buying rewards could be used for better servers, more storage, to cover dev costs etc.

I have no clue how Federation would work around this it's probably complex. Thoughts?

Edit: We could have a option to hide badges for those that don't want this feature. It's purely cosmetic

Rewards - Feature Idea and potential for monitisation
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (11 children)

My problem with awards (as they were implemented on reddit) is twofold:

  1. They act as a "super-upvote," because a post/comment that gets an award will often end up upvoted to the top of a thread. This is essentially allowing someone to pay to increase the visibility of one particular view over others. This is counter to the democratic forum nature of the up/downvoting system.
  2. They incentivise least-common-denominator behaviour from commenters who then race to be the first to make the most obvious joke or reply so that they might get awarded for it. It doesn't engender good and thoughtful content.

Edit: thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Edit: thanks for the gold, kind stranger!

    That would drive me nuts. Same with people who would edit their comments to freak out and thank everyone for the upvotes like it was an oscar award speech. There was a lot of strange behavior the developed over time. I like the idea of awards as a source of monetization as long as it doesn't influence the conversation. Like what was said elsewhere just a cosmetic change.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I'm proposing it purely for cosmetics, it won't boost your comment or post with default sort.

    And users can opt out of seeing any rewards.

    It's just a nice fun thing to have, and something small you get for making a donation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    visual flare will influence how people subconsciously vote. if somebody gave a comment gold then they obviously thought it was of greater value, which will influence others to find it more valuable too, resulting in more upvotes which repeats the cycle. that's why comment awards are an excellent catalyst for mimetic desire and in turn social manipulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    post/comment that gets an award will often end up upvoted to the top of a thread

    Maybe that's because it's a good comment? Or because Reddit treats it that way in their proprietary algorithm, of which there's no such thing here, and as far as I can tell, is not part of this pitch.

    They incentivise least-common-denominator behaviour from commenters who then race to be the first to make the most obvious joke or reply

    Why would anyone be farming these meaningless awards?

    It doesn't engender good and thoughtful content.

    Why would a comment with no good or thoughtful content get an award?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I guess you never used reddit back in the olden days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I guess you didn't read the comments you replied to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)