and Epic Games stance on Linux gaming is known

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Hmm, your original response pre-edit was a lot nicer.

I didn’t say I purchased a game, I said I paid for a game.

I also didn't use the word purchase. You said "paid for a game", I quoted you as saying you "paid for a game".

Why are you pretending I misquoted you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    Because the difference seemed to be what your point was. If it wasn't, I have no idea what it was. I paid for a license for a game. Thus I paid for a game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    That was my point -- I was building off of what you said...

    I paid for a license for a game. Thus I paid for a game.

    This is exactly the problem. This should be true, but it isn't in most cases.

    Store's like GOG get much closer by giving you a DRM free copy. But some would say that even then, if you aren't allowed to modify and distribute that, you don't really own the game either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Okay so if I didn't pay for a license for a game, what did I pay for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You did, and that licence comes with plenty of terms that can restrict or revoke your access to that game.

    Which shouldn't be allowed, but it is.

    In an ideal world, you wouldn't have to purchase a license to the game at all. You could purchase the game itself by receiving a packaged copy of it along with a copy of the source code.

    But something inbetween would be a nice start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Great, I'm glad we sorted that out. Thanks for the unnecessary clarification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Lol you say you want a discussion and then act like a dickhead when someone engages in that discussion.

    Nice work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I didn't say I wanted a discussion? Why are you misquoting me? I just honestly have no fucking idea what your point is and it's tiresome. Goodbye now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    We seriously need to have a long conversation

    This you?

    I just honestly have no fucking idea what your point is and it’s tiresome.

    Skill issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How convenient that you omitted the part of the sentence that describes what the conversation is about. It wasn't this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it was about what constitutes a refund, which I built upon...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You didn't build upon anything, you exclusively attempted to derail the conversation into some sort of ridiculous semantics argument that I still don't understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment