▲ 64 ▼ librephone (librephone.fsf.org) submitted 1 year ago by smps@sopuli.xyz to c/degoogle@lemmy.ml 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments "This is a project to research proprietary files in Android to work towards a long-term goal of free replacements." Meaning; to develop FOSS alternatives for the Google parts in the Android system.
[+] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) Reverse engineering certain android software components might enable more phones to work under linux as well as lineage or similar. For instance if a modem requires a certain kernel module under android, that might be usable in linux as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* And potentially make them better too. Maybe a generic wireless driver that works on almost all phones (even if slow), or it's not uncommon for the industry to gatekeep features to newer models. OSS would likely get those features running on old hardware anyway. That's not even mentioning the spyware and AI garbage baked into everything. Or nerfing cpu/battery performance on devices for planned obsolescence. permalink fedilink source parent [–] confuser@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That sounds useful but I thought the biggest issue was services require google certified software and hardware or something to that effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago I think that is the big upcoming issue, yes. I don't quite understand the nuances but the gist seems to be they are locking it down so F-Droid can't work anymore. Still, blobs could help linux. permalink fedilink source parent [–] smps@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 1 year ago Access to Android app library might be considered a plus? permalink fedilink source parent [–] VoidJuiceConcentrate@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago oh I bet the Phosh folks will be keeping an eye on this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) A lot of the ux and higher level HAL work is done, and the obstacles on android remain in the drivers and signed blobs. Linux is great, but phosh, plasma and gnome mobile are pretty poor interface experiences at the moment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago you absolutely can permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) Reverse engineering certain android software components might enable more phones to work under linux as well as lineage or similar. For instance if a modem requires a certain kernel module under android, that might be usable in linux as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* And potentially make them better too. Maybe a generic wireless driver that works on almost all phones (even if slow), or it's not uncommon for the industry to gatekeep features to newer models. OSS would likely get those features running on old hardware anyway. That's not even mentioning the spyware and AI garbage baked into everything. Or nerfing cpu/battery performance on devices for planned obsolescence. permalink fedilink source parent [–] confuser@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That sounds useful but I thought the biggest issue was services require google certified software and hardware or something to that effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago I think that is the big upcoming issue, yes. I don't quite understand the nuances but the gist seems to be they are locking it down so F-Droid can't work anymore. Still, blobs could help linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* And potentially make them better too. Maybe a generic wireless driver that works on almost all phones (even if slow), or it's not uncommon for the industry to gatekeep features to newer models. OSS would likely get those features running on old hardware anyway. That's not even mentioning the spyware and AI garbage baked into everything. Or nerfing cpu/battery performance on devices for planned obsolescence. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) That sounds useful but I thought the biggest issue was services require google certified software and hardware or something to that effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago I think that is the big upcoming issue, yes. I don't quite understand the nuances but the gist seems to be they are locking it down so F-Droid can't work anymore. Still, blobs could help linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago I think that is the big upcoming issue, yes. I don't quite understand the nuances but the gist seems to be they are locking it down so F-Droid can't work anymore. Still, blobs could help linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] smps@sopuli.xyz [S] 2 points 1 year ago Access to Android app library might be considered a plus? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VoidJuiceConcentrate@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago oh I bet the Phosh folks will be keeping an eye on this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) A lot of the ux and higher level HAL work is done, and the obstacles on android remain in the drivers and signed blobs. Linux is great, but phosh, plasma and gnome mobile are pretty poor interface experiences at the moment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago you absolutely can permalink fedilink source parent
[+] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago you absolutely can permalink fedilink source parent
[–] somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago you absolutely can permalink fedilink source parent