76
“No Kings?,” How About “No Presidents!” (itsgoingdown.org)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As momentum builds under the banner of “No Kings!” liberals and other activists in the U.S. should consider the real question of how we got here and how we can move forward and away from Trump’s authoritarianism altogether. The question isn’t about monarchy versus presidency, but about the myth of representation itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (12 children)

But there would still be a genocide going on with your tacit support, so if you can enjoy brunch while your tax dollars are murdering children then I guess we just have different standards.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Although it's not said explicitly, the article uses the "we'd be at brunch" sign as an example of rhetoric that uses the liberal "No Kings" framing. The writers of the article would disagree with the message of this sign, as would any anarchist worth taking seriously, because it argues that changing the figurehead (to Kamala Harris) would be a solution, instead of abolishing the figurehead at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Well yes, but the people must be alienated from the decisions that shape their lives somehow. What is your proposal, if not aristocratic jingoist celebretism in the trappings if not official title of a monarch?

    Feeding all of our conversations into a new llm, to be trained on the nsa's most recent surveillance data on the first of each year?

    Or something involving dice?

    Doesn't seem much better, if you ask me. Which you shouldn't; speak only to my attorney.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Flat, answerable governance. That's all. People only need alienation from terrible decisions. The insulation/alienation from the outcomes of their decisions are what allow them to make such horrible decisions easily.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I did read the fucking article, but I dunno if you know this, people are free to engage with all or part of a post however they see fit; I chose to engage only with the sign itself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    If i paid taxes, yeah. If somebody cute were chewing on my neck right now, i think id enjoy it, and i had to take a detour to avoid a buncha shit heads with assault rifles getting groceries this morning-i think military, not feds, but who can even tell anymore, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent