you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Technically, anything that has been modified from the raw camera sensor data is a “filter” if you consider filter as any image manipulation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Sounds good. Put a watermark on it if it has a filter or otherwise manipulated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How about one of those sliders where you reveal the original image and it can be half and half? Make it a capital crime not to do it. Auto-levels with no original? Straight to jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Love it. An instant felony and banned from posting pictures in media for the rest of your life. If you break that law, then your face is removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    if the law applied exactly as the person above you described, it would be utterly useless, because every single photo you'll see online would be marked as manipulated. people don't post raw sensor data, online platforms don't accept raw sensor data, in many cases it's difficult to even get the data raw and not as a jpeg

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment