▲ 29 ▼ AI-powered CRISPR could lead to faster gene therapies, Stanford Medicine study finds (med.stanford.edu) submitted 1 year ago by DarkBluemetal@lemmy.world [B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) is this what the article talks about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) CRISPR is the tool that lets us precisely edit genes in DNA, which contain the instructions for making proteins. AlphaFold is the AI tool that helped us understand what those edits actually do. It’s the 3D shape of the protein that determines its function - without understanding protein folding, gene editing would be like changing code in a language you don’t fully understand and just hoping it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rapchee@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) so while not the same, it's a fairly similar field, it is a safe to assume that similar tools can be used. not yet though, the tool is not ready. why is there a study for this? other than hype - for "ai", which this arguably isn't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago “ai could do x one day” is speculation at best AI can do, and has done X already. That's my point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) CRISPR is the tool that lets us precisely edit genes in DNA, which contain the instructions for making proteins. AlphaFold is the AI tool that helped us understand what those edits actually do. It’s the 3D shape of the protein that determines its function - without understanding protein folding, gene editing would be like changing code in a language you don’t fully understand and just hoping it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rapchee@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) so while not the same, it's a fairly similar field, it is a safe to assume that similar tools can be used. not yet though, the tool is not ready. why is there a study for this? other than hype - for "ai", which this arguably isn't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago “ai could do x one day” is speculation at best AI can do, and has done X already. That's my point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) so while not the same, it's a fairly similar field, it is a safe to assume that similar tools can be used. not yet though, the tool is not ready. why is there a study for this? other than hype - for "ai", which this arguably isn't permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago “ai could do x one day” is speculation at best AI can do, and has done X already. That's my point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago “ai could do x one day” is speculation at best AI can do, and has done X already. That's my point. permalink fedilink source parent