520
A cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inman (theoatmeal.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

and having someone else make it.

No, having a soulless machine make it.

Then claiming that you made it yourself even though all you did was select a few things on a menu.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh my fucking god people...I didn't say you could claim you made something when using AI generated images. I claimed it still makes sense for some things because they hold pretty much no artistic value when made by humans already (like icons, stock images and logos)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Way to shit on everyone who's job it is to make those things.

    Why do you think logos and so on have no artistic value? What defines value? Because if it's influencing people and culture, then logos definitely do.

    Corporate art sucks ass but it's still made using choices, which ai doesn't do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent