▲ 1590 ▼ Apple has REMOVED the ICEBlock app from the App Store due to “objectionable content.” (bsky.app) submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world 317 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 38 points 1 year ago (12 children) the USA Goverment probably forced them to remove it permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago (4 children) not probably; the doj forced apple to remove it and apple caved: https://www.404media.co/iceblock-owner-after-apple-removes-app-we-are-determined-to-fight-this/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago ofc permalink fedilink source parent [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I keep seeing things about how x, y or z company "caved" to government pressure, as if companies have ever made value judgements in the modern era. What this decision would have come down to, the only thing it could legally come down to, is shareholder value. Considering Apple secured a reprieve on tariffs, it's absolutely within reason that Trump and/or his administration threatened them with cancelling said reprieve. At that point, the decision would be based off the loss of sales for taking it down, against the loss of sales of devices due to tariff price increases. Apple has a fiduciary duty to their shareholders first and foremost. There is nothing stopping this batshit insane administration from enacting tariffs, and then using the SEC and DOJ to investigate and bring charges that they aren't upholding their responsibilities to their investors. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) apple could easily move all manufacturing and operations to canada and demolish the us economy... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa,,,, oh wait,,, you're serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Edit: I know I'm being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I've seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] bigfondue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago oh yeah,makes sense tho permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago not even a solid gold base, a cheap gold base, with a "glass sculpture" permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, they don't have to. The corporations are the ones who want to control everyone. The U.S government is just a tool for them. The politicians are basically just actors at this point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieplup@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago It's a bit more complicated than that and trump also isn't as easy to control cause he is a member of the billionare class. It's why there was that movement to try and replace trump with DeSantis. There's also multiple factions. of billionaires as well. Some of them are idealogical fascists. Some only care about money. Some are technofeudalists. Corporations or more accuratlely Capitalists control the government yes. But the billionare class isn't a monolith. There's also a cost benefit analysis. Morals aside there is little benefit for apple to oppose trump unless they think opposing trump will significantly impact their sales. Which reasonably don't think will be the case. especially if the competitor is also playing ball. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They also caved into PRC government and they removed the apps that reported on HK police activity and added restrictions for airdrop to make information sharing harder. permalink fedilink source parent [–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago no shit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago (4 children) not probably; the doj forced apple to remove it and apple caved: https://www.404media.co/iceblock-owner-after-apple-removes-app-we-are-determined-to-fight-this/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago ofc permalink fedilink source parent [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I keep seeing things about how x, y or z company "caved" to government pressure, as if companies have ever made value judgements in the modern era. What this decision would have come down to, the only thing it could legally come down to, is shareholder value. Considering Apple secured a reprieve on tariffs, it's absolutely within reason that Trump and/or his administration threatened them with cancelling said reprieve. At that point, the decision would be based off the loss of sales for taking it down, against the loss of sales of devices due to tariff price increases. Apple has a fiduciary duty to their shareholders first and foremost. There is nothing stopping this batshit insane administration from enacting tariffs, and then using the SEC and DOJ to investigate and bring charges that they aren't upholding their responsibilities to their investors. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) apple could easily move all manufacturing and operations to canada and demolish the us economy... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa,,,, oh wait,,, you're serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Edit: I know I'm being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I've seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I keep seeing things about how x, y or z company "caved" to government pressure, as if companies have ever made value judgements in the modern era. What this decision would have come down to, the only thing it could legally come down to, is shareholder value. Considering Apple secured a reprieve on tariffs, it's absolutely within reason that Trump and/or his administration threatened them with cancelling said reprieve. At that point, the decision would be based off the loss of sales for taking it down, against the loss of sales of devices due to tariff price increases. Apple has a fiduciary duty to their shareholders first and foremost. There is nothing stopping this batshit insane administration from enacting tariffs, and then using the SEC and DOJ to investigate and bring charges that they aren't upholding their responsibilities to their investors. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) apple could easily move all manufacturing and operations to canada and demolish the us economy... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa,,,, oh wait,,, you're serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Edit: I know I'm being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I've seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) apple could easily move all manufacturing and operations to canada and demolish the us economy... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa,,,, oh wait,,, you're serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Edit: I know I'm being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I've seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa,,,, oh wait,,, you're serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Edit: I know I'm being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I've seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bigfondue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago oh yeah,makes sense tho permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago not even a solid gold base, a cheap gold base, with a "glass sculpture" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 point 1 year ago not even a solid gold base, a cheap gold base, with a "glass sculpture" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, they don't have to. The corporations are the ones who want to control everyone. The U.S government is just a tool for them. The politicians are basically just actors at this point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieplup@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago It's a bit more complicated than that and trump also isn't as easy to control cause he is a member of the billionare class. It's why there was that movement to try and replace trump with DeSantis. There's also multiple factions. of billionaires as well. Some of them are idealogical fascists. Some only care about money. Some are technofeudalists. Corporations or more accuratlely Capitalists control the government yes. But the billionare class isn't a monolith. There's also a cost benefit analysis. Morals aside there is little benefit for apple to oppose trump unless they think opposing trump will significantly impact their sales. Which reasonably don't think will be the case. especially if the competitor is also playing ball. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieplup@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago It's a bit more complicated than that and trump also isn't as easy to control cause he is a member of the billionare class. It's why there was that movement to try and replace trump with DeSantis. There's also multiple factions. of billionaires as well. Some of them are idealogical fascists. Some only care about money. Some are technofeudalists. Corporations or more accuratlely Capitalists control the government yes. But the billionare class isn't a monolith. There's also a cost benefit analysis. Morals aside there is little benefit for apple to oppose trump unless they think opposing trump will significantly impact their sales. Which reasonably don't think will be the case. especially if the competitor is also playing ball. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago They also caved into PRC government and they removed the apps that reported on HK police activity and added restrictions for airdrop to make information sharing harder. permalink fedilink source parent