▲ 25 ▼ Intel and AMD trusted enclaves, a foundation for network security, fall to physical attacks (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to c/news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) New clicks! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago Well not only, there are still industry solutions relying on this infra, going "state actors in our data center are not a threat"..... From Signal Messenger of all places.... I remember one intel technology was pretty thoroughly tested and field proven, (and had significant memory constraints since almost everything happened on-chip as far as I remember) what came after (with similar AMD/IBM/ARM tech) was quite controversial as far as I remember. I think it was SGX 1 vs 2 or maybe Intel-TE that was marked tamper resistant, because everything happened on die, but I could misremember. On the other hand: Reddit thread about SGX from 5 years ago. I think the talking point even back then was "state actors in our data center are not a concern". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago Well not only, there are still industry solutions relying on this infra, going "state actors in our data center are not a threat"..... From Signal Messenger of all places.... I remember one intel technology was pretty thoroughly tested and field proven, (and had significant memory constraints since almost everything happened on-chip as far as I remember) what came after (with similar AMD/IBM/ARM tech) was quite controversial as far as I remember. I think it was SGX 1 vs 2 or maybe Intel-TE that was marked tamper resistant, because everything happened on die, but I could misremember. On the other hand: Reddit thread about SGX from 5 years ago. I think the talking point even back then was "state actors in our data center are not a concern". permalink fedilink source parent