Just I think it's time for us to, ask him a question about his progress in fixing what last update has broken in AI chats.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, I got your point. To know whether much of users like old model better then new or not, a vote can be made.

@Randomize@lemmy.world previously, those topics was getting more upvotes than downvotes. Maybe unsatisfied people just left?

And about using. Well, maybe Dev don't want to take donations and put more ads. But for some other reason it looks like Dev is interested in more users rather than less. (The less users is very simply achievable. Just use what you did for yourself.)

Also about space... It may be a reason, if he has single video card. Then, frequently loading different models on card would consume time. That's will be costly in time. Or have constantly loaded in GPU RAM. Then it's costly.

But if he is running an array of GPU's anyway... well, I still think that by providing less consuming model's one can save resources.

If you are saying that sas hdd is costly. So costly that another, how much, 16 gigs, is really much for it, then actually I disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Your missing the point. It doesn't matter what users want. If the dev wants to upgrade to a new model it's their decision. Unless you own or otherwise have some stake (and thus a vote) in this business, then you (and I) have no say in what they do. What is more helpful is providing good feedback (bugs, quirks, failures) that can be used to make decisions. If you want to help the dev make things better you do so with constructive feedback that informs rather than blames or cajoles. Those who want a vote in how their preferred image or text ai works should either use a paid service that allows users to have a say, or create/download and train your own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I agree with Mack2. Also I'd like to ask, what makes you think "it looks like Dev is interested in more users rather than less."? Maybe it's not about how many users. Maybe it's about providing a certain service (free, uncensored, easy to access, open source) for no matter how many or few users want to use it. Afaik this combination of features is unique.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    @Randomize @StupAsking I personally don't demand anything form someone who provides a playground like this.Not even that the person lets us vote, provides a choice or care about us.I shut up and use the service as is.If Dev wishes to know what to do, Dev might ask the users. Until then, I won't even speculate about the motives for offering me the opportunity to experiment with AI.For free.

  • source
  • parent