you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They are also working to similarly kill custom ROMs. Just recently the GrapheneOS team mentioned that Google is no longer making their hardware drivers Open Source, and so compatibility with new phones means reverse engineering their own drivers - which is a big reason that custom ROMs support such narrow hardware options already and very often come with limitations and/or features that just don't work. At best, they figure out how to make it work, but it takes time and updates can lag significantly behind.

We have a lot of options on the software side for avoiding google (or android), but very limited options on hardware. We need open source mobile hardware support ASAP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why do you think they're making this arbitrary change?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    What do you think the benefit of closing sourcing their software is if not to stifle competition?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    As someone whose job runs several FOSS projects, I think you're making up the fact that it adds meaningful workload.

    I think that, for all intents and purposes, protecting IP is equivalent to stifling competition.

    I think giving away code benefits the entire Android ecosystem, which might be the largest data mining operating Google has. I fully believe that's of nonzero benefit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)