The ex-Fox News host railed against decades of work to diversify the all-volunteer military as he announced initiatives to effectively exclude women from combat roles and relax protections against hazing and bullying of troops

More than 800 of America’s top military leaders sat silent and showed no reaction as ex-Fox News presenter turned Pentagon boss Pete Hegseth told them he was issuing a series of new directives that will make it harder for women to serve in combat and easier for personnel to engage in hazing and bullying without repercussions during an unprecedented gathering of flag-rank officers at a Marine Corps base in Virginia on Tuesday.

The Secretary of War — a title not used by the head of the U.S. military establishment since 1947 but revived by President Donald Trump earlier this month — told the group of admirals, generals, and their senior enlisted advisers he was “ending the war on warriors” and complained that too many of their peers had been put in their roles “for the wrong reasons” including their race and gender.

Standing in front of a large American flag backdrop, he attacked by name several of the leaders’ retired peers, telling them that the department’s “compass heading” was “clear.”

“Out with the Chiarelli, the McKenzies and the Milleys and in with the Stockdales the Schwartzkopfs and the Pattons,” he said, denigrating former Army Vice Chief of Staff General Peter Chiarelli, ex-U.S. Central Command commander and Marine Corps General Kenneth McKenzie Jr, and ex-Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman and Army General Mark Milley, each of whom has been critical of Trump or his administration.

“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,” he added.

Hegseth also groused about efforts to open up combat roles to women and initiatives to “weed out so-called toxic leaders” and blamed “foolish and reckless” politicians for having “set the wrong compass” and causing the Pentagon to lose its way.

Hegseth, an Iraq War veteran who attained the rank of Major in the Army National Guard but became a critic of the Pentagon’s efforts to open up military service to women, racial minorities and LGBT+ persons, said the War Department must “restore a ruthless, dispassionate and common sense application of standards” that are “uniform, gender neutral and high.”

He told the assembled leaders he was issuing a directive to ensure that “every designated Combat Arms” role across all branches “returns to the highest male standard only,” all but reversing a 2015 directive from then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter to open all combat roles to women.

“If you do not meet the male level physical standards for combat positions ... it's time for a new position or a new profession,” he said. “If women can make it excellent. If not, it is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it.”

The War Secretary also claimed — without offering evidence — that the Pentagon had lowered standards “to hit racial quotas as well” and said the revised standards he was promulgating are based on what he called the “1990 test,” which compares today’s standards to those in 1990, a time when women were barred from combat roles and LGBT+ persons were banned from serving.

“The 1990s test is simple. What were the military standards in 1990 and if they have changed, tell me why was it a necessary change based on the evolving landscape of combat, or was the change due to a softening, weakening or gender based pursuit of other priorities? 1990s seems to be as good a place to start as any,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 192 points 1 year ago (71 children)

I wonder how generals feel about being told how to do their jobs by a major.

  • source
  • hideshow 71 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm sure they are hyped, delighted, and filled with espirit de corps about all of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    "Hey you fat fucks, none of this girl shit. We're going to all do push-ups and jack off to the good kind of porn and get cool Hearts of Iron 4 tattoos and pray to the Real Jesus and any of you phony losers who complains can hit the fucking bricks! Now lets go fight some wars because we love peace!"

    Punches the air

    Chops crotch repeatedly

    Tries to do a stage dive, hesitates, and walks it back pretending to look cool about it

    Yeah, I can't imagine why this fell flat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago* (60 children)

    Starting to think the military may be the last hope of true allegiance to the flag.

    Trump needs a war to declare martial law and then undermine elections. He can then claim he's only doing what Zelenskyy has done.

    Think we also saw this tried in South Korea didn't we?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 60 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (52 children)

    He can claim anything, but Ukraine's constitution doesn't allow elections during war. America's does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (28 children)

    given that the public now has no way to remove leadership that's running a war this badly.

    What? David is holding his own against Goliath, but that’s “running a war this badly”?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    He said the other day he doesn't want to seek another term after the war is over.

    Can't blame him, I'd want out of it too if I were in his position.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Easy way for the war to end, would be to have putin take his fucking invading army out of Ukraine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Yeah I think the Ukrainians are just defending their homeland and way of life. I doubt they would go into russia, I don't think they are nearly as stupid as the russian government

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Defending your homeland by invading another country is a stretch, let's be honest.

    And Ukraine going into russia, because russia is actively invading is very different than if russia fully withdrew, and then Ukraine invaded unprompted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The original invasion of Ukraine like the iron curtain taking their territory? Or like in 2014 when russia invaded Crimea? Or are you talking about something else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    the iron curtain taking their territory?

    My great grandfather was burned alive in a synagogue when the Nazis and their Banderite allies captured Ukraine.

    When does he get his territory back?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    When your country is being invaded by a colonizer, elections would be, at best near impossible to run free and fairly, at worst a guarantee for interference

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    1864 isn't recent. Times have changed, it's easier to target civilians lining up to vote. There wasn't an active war on in 1949 give me a break

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not when your neighbour is bombing your civilian population centers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Seems useful at the moment, given Russia's penchant for election interference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is Moldova at war?

    And how did Moldova achieve it? By booting out the obvious traitors.

    A model for America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Does it matter?

    It's the whole point of this thread.

    Ukraine’s constitution doesn’t allow elections during war

    But the answer is "not really" because the Ukrainian constitution doesn't apply to Moldova.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The notion that Russia can rig elections in their favor hasn't born out over the last two years.

    Doesn't mean they haven't been trying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes? All the big colonial powers love to meddle in other country's elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Hard to say he's running the war badly considering that Ukraine still exists 3 years later when most outside observers were wondering if Ukraine would last 3 days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Since the Iraqi military was either defeated on the battlefield or surrendered and US troops pulled Saddam out of a spider hole to drag him off for trial and execution, I'd call that a bad analogy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    In the backdrop of this, does that even remotely matter?

    It only matters insofar as the courts uphold that; and even if they do, Courts have no enforcement arm to ensure adherence.

    This will ultimately rest on how much individual states or these military generals want to unilaterally push back.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    ...as a response to the President advocating for invading US cities to 'train for war' and all the other shit that violates the thing they are sworn to protect, the Constitution.

    Also, the more time goes on without any mention of the integrity of the last election while openly advocating for more and more election manipulation and voter disenfranchisement, the more I am convinced that the Republicans directly rigged the 2024 election instead of their regular tactics. It would be yet another thing that Republicans claimed Dems were doing because Republicans were planning or doing it already.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    Look at reporting for any coup that has ever happened.

    Take note of how those reports talk about which side has support of the military.

    “The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Trump can say and do whatever he wants .... it really doesn't matter

    The thing of it is ... what will the country and the rest of the US government ALLOW HIM to get away with.

    Trump has no power ... only the power that he is allowed to have ... and so far, the US government, both political parties and the citizens have been more than willing to allow him to get away with whatever he wants.

    I don't blame some dumb orange politician ... I blame the entire country for their shared collective stupidity.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)