308
Here comes a new JPEG challenger (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For anyone curious - https://flif.info/

EDIT: am a dumbass, JPGXL extends from FLIF

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

For me it's the opposite. Lossy ones (the ones that seem to maintain quality while lowering size by a lot) are magic to me but lossless is understandable.

What do you mean "treat this image as a wave and do an inverse Fourier transform on it in order to discard the high frequency low amplitude noise". wtf? Straight up magic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I guess there are two kinds of magic. There is the magic of Fourrier which is lossy with funny math. But it is understandable that one can get higher compression ratios when it's lossy. But I find it even more magic that we can still find better ways to encode images losslessly. I would have thought we had already long found the optimal way

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •