Flippanarchy

flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

2,894 readers

2,301 active

279 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules

If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 2 years ago

moderation log

moderators

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

we must maintain the status quo (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago by dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To anyone who supports capitalism or otherwise opposes socialism:

Do you support the idea that one man can accumulate enough wealth to own all land of this Earth, making everyone born in his empire under his rule as long as he can kill to defend it? What prevents capitalism from accomplishing this in law? What law exists that limits the borders of nations?

Why, then, must we endure a system where a single man owning the Earth and enslave it is a feature, not a bug?

https://dice.camp/@sean/114698774200264413

I just wanna know what people think. Why must this be maintained? Why is any opposition to capping wealth just the end of the world when it probably would save it, just logically thinking it through?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

a few people hold the capital

Capitalism does not enforce a minimum amount of population holding capital, so it can be reduced to 1. Feature, not a bug.

Capitalism is the same as every other system that’s gone before

Every other system? How many systems do you think we have observed in all of human history? What do you believe to be the earliest system ever devised?

No other system ever increased the minimum amount of people owning capital to be higher than a few?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Okay, you just want to argue with someone, and for some reason you picked me today, even though we substantially agree.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 1 point 1 year ago*

I fundamentally disagree that capitalism is like every other system ever done before, that is all I am saying. I need evidence that capitalism being the same as every other system is true, and I lack it. This is part of why I posed my original question. Why are people seemingly not be able to fathom a single system that can replace capitalism?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent