you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

In the mid-70s, our population was smaller than South Australia (around 600k).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    SA has struggled to be economically viable almost since the first settlers. While Perth might be shooting ahead now, I think it was on a similar trajectory to Brisbane for most of that time while Adelaide flatlined.. South Australia is a difficult place to maintain long term growth I think. On the plus side without the boom you don't get the bust and growth has its own challenges.

  • source
  • parent