you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Why would he be acquited?

Edit: when a question gets downvoted you just might be too emotionally fragile to be online

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    This is always a wild one to me, he did it and hes a hero for it, stop erasing his badass act. It’s such a fringe conspiracy that not even Luigi has endorsed it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Allegedly..he hasn't admitted to anything afaik.. and as far as I've seen the evidence is flimsy ..why would he escape and then hang out in a fast food restaurant with the disposable murder weapon?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Why would he be acquited?

    I up voted because who the fuck would assume any practical result where USA is concerned.

    It's naive to think that Luigi has any future in a fascist country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    To answer your question in a non facetious way, there's a phenomenon called the csi effect. Essentially, juries expect csi levels of ironclad proof that tends to make it much harder than expected to convict.

    Combined with the high profile and over politicisation and publication of the case, i see it damn near impossible fornthem to find 12 jurists who will unanimously find not only enough evidence, but not have a refuser based on sociopolitical contexts- much like how OJ walked on the LAPD's corruption.

  • source
  • parent