Edit: This only refers to costs (paid by the manufacturers), not fees (paid for by the buyers).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Why?

We traded energy cost for time when we stopped walking, and replaced it with an animal and a cart, and again with cars, and airplanes. We save time, but the energy input is greater.

Who’s to say that teleportation wouldn’t be a trade off between 5x the energy to take a jet, but instantaneous?

Digital goods aren’t physical; teleportation is physical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Considering that
    Power = WorkDone / TimeTaken
    and lets just say for this instance that WorkDone is same for the jet and for the teleporter^[because calculating work done in such a scenario is kinda hard], which is kinda wrong, but won't matter anyway as you see further.

    Then,
    Powerteleporter = Powerjet × TimeTakenjet / TimeTakenteleporter

    then going with "instantaneous"

    With limit(TimeTakenteleporter ⟶ 0)

    Powerteleporter ⟶ ∞

    Now, someone will ask, what if WorkDone in case of teleportation is actually close to 0.
    But that won't happen, simply because the minimum value for WorkDone in that case would be equivalent to the change in gravitational potential, making it a significant amount as compared to the other limits.


    Oh and digital goods do have an energy cost, btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments