https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJmcqjP8mhk

I don't believe I commented on Brian Thomas assassination except maybe to meme on the Americans about their fucked healthcare system and gloat about my Australian supremacy in that particular regard.

If u want my take tho here we go: Their is no moral justification for the murder of anyone Brian Thomson included. If you are to justify it then you must do so through the lens of warfare. Warfare is not a moral action it is the practised systematised usage of violence to achieve ends that cannot be achieved by other means. Morality has no power in the face of overwhelming violence. It is the execution of Darwinian selection by the strong upon the week. Luigi practised warfare to shift the balance of probability in favour of approving claims (lest u be shot) and it worked until black rock shifted them back by suing them for not being profitable enough. Their is no moral justification for warfare or such actions short of "I have the capacity for superior violence and I will use it to take what I want". Luigi is now finding out that he did not in fact have superior violence Brian Thomson did as he is backed by the rule of lsw and thus the states monopoly of violence. The best definition of a nation is an area in which a single entity holds a near monopoly on violence. Luigi will spend the rest of his life locked in a box experiencing the practised, systematised, and agreed upon near monopoly on violence the state holds.

This of course is closely linked with revolution as u get revolution when the rules of the system are considered unjust by the people who control said monopoly of violence. We have law and order and rules because we have all agree that we have these things. The second the monopoly on violence is held by someone who claims these things are different they utilise their monopoly of violence to change the rules in their favour. This is also an excellent justification for the second amendment (Charlie Kirk commented on exactly this). This is why the celebration of Charlie Kirk's assassination by the left is so monumentally stupid because if democracy and free speech fail they do not hold a monopoly on violence (the Republicans will be 2 for 2 when it comes to winning civil wars).

If the people own guns the people can collectively at any point come together to make monopoly of violence and impose their will upon those without. The intention behind the second amendment was this exact purpose. To ensure the continued ability for the people to revolt against their own government in the case of democracy failing. Democracy has only broken down once in american history at which point the people collectively came together to exercise their monopoly of violence against the confederates. This is the second amendment working as intended. Unfortunately the second amendment has been watered down to the point it can no longer fulfill its intended purpose. The second amendment in its original interpretation mandated that every conscriptable man had the right and obligation to receive military training and bear military weapons. This was of course borrowed from the Swiss as this is the same concept they used to become a free, independent, self determinant nation.

Here's 5: https://news.sky.com/story/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-was-in-romantic-relationship-with-transgender-roommate-utah-governor-13431020 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/14/charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-roommate https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/tyler-robinson-accused-of-killing-charlie-kirk-lived-with-transgender-partner-who-is-now-helping-fbi-report-9274199 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/charlie-kirks-assassin-lived-transgender-partner-who-now-cooperating-fbi-sources https://www.timesofisrael.com/utah-governor-charlie-kirk-murder-suspect-clearly-a-leftist-lived-with-trans-partner/

I didn't just say celebrating I said justifying u can go look through any comment chain on any lemmy post about Charlie and see exactly that.

Their u go justifying his murder under a thin hander of I don't care, but I care enough to write multiple paragraphs.

Yeah people on the right are calling for civil war. The right holds a monopoly on violence and if they choose to their is nothing u can do to stop them. This is what happens when u kill the moderate "let's talk it out guy" the extremists go extreme and take most of the moderates who just had their role model assassinated with them.

The sources I provided paint a pretty clear picture of his political affiliations. Ur undertaking of a song famously used by antifa must be seriously floored to think its right wing.

"As for ideology what what place is it for the gays to be out in public pushing their beliefs on society" that's literally ur argument and fucking retarded. Everyone has the right to advocate for their beliefs that's freedom of expression, that's free speech, that's liberty.

I assume you've seen this video where Charlie argues directly against the nanny of gay people? Or does that not for ur narrative?

For the record I'm not religious I believe we don't have sufficient evidence to confirm or deny the existence of god. To stick to one side and claim it with absolute certainty is plain ignorance, you have just as much evidence against religion as Charlie has for it (except maybe he can quote a book of questionable reputation at you). Your both ignorant in this regard. But it is you who is mortally wrong to justify denying him the right express his beliefs as he pleases.